As storytellers, we usually want to keep readers immersed in our story. However, we’ve probably all written lines that we worry will break readers’ suspension of disbelief, such as with story events that might feel too cliché, coincidental, or incongruent. Obviously, we can try to fix the issue by changing those elements, but what if they’re necessary for the story we want to tell?
In that case, we might simply hope that the strength of our surrounding lines or story flow will carry readers past that point without pulling them out of the narrative. But there’s another option that may help overcome a reader’s awareness: the writing technique of “lampshading.” Let’s explore what the lampshade technique is and how we can use it (and not abuse it) in our stories.
What Is the “Lampshade” Technique
Believe it or not, the lampshade/lantern/lampshade-hanging technique is just this: Purposely call attention to a cliché, illogical, or contrived element, often in characters’ dialogue. By calling attention to something that threatens a readers’ suspension of disbelief, we’re essentially telling readers, “Yep, the story world thinks these elements are odd too. Just roll with it.”
The TV Tropes site includes many examples, which point out how this technique isn’t new:
Sir Toby Belch: Is’t possible?
Fabian: If this were played upon a stage now, I could condemn it as an improbable fiction.
— Shakespeare, Twelfth Night
In addition to simply using self-awareness to point out issues, lampshading can sometimes also take the opportunity to answer or justify how the situation makes sense. For example, to defuse readers’ skepticism or criticism of an event, a character might share further information after the fact, such as explaining unknown motivations:
Lampshade: “Yeah, I’m glad we won, but why did Klaus suddenly decide to help us?” Susan threw up her hands. “That makes no sense. He never wanted our team to win.”
Justification: Paula pointed down the field to the opposing team. “See that girl? Cynthia broke up with him last night—ugly scene from what I heard. Maybe he wanted her team to lose more than he didn’t want us to win.”
Depending on circumstances, lampshading can create moments that come off as winking, hilarious, clever (or too-clever-for-its-own-good), meta, lazy, handwaving away weak writing, etc. So we need to understand when lampshading will help or hurt our writing and story.
Lampshading Might Hurt Our Story When…
Lampshading done well helps keep readers immersed in our story, but lampshading done poorly risks pulling readers out of our story even more than if we had just left our writing alone.
Situations where lampshading can hurt our story or writing include:
- Our story’s style is serious or sincere, so even mild or well-done lampshading risks a tonal change of being too-clever, meta, or jokey.
- Our story’s narrative is strong and/or readers of our genre won’t question the plot tropes/clichés, so lampshading risks an impression of “apologizing” for lines or elements that readers may not even notice if we don’t point them out.
- The questionable elements are part of a strong emotional moment in our story, so lampshading risks undercutting—or at least interrupting—the emotions we wanted to evoke (such as in the game-winning example above).
- Our story naturally keeps readers at a distance—less engaged or immersed—so any lampshading, especially meta, fourth-wall-breaking, or too-clever-by-half moments (unless, of course, that’s the kind of story we’re trying to tell), risks preventing readers from taking anything seriously (e.g., if our characters don’t seem fully invested and care about the story’s events, readers might not care either).
- The questionable elements are part of a major or important moment in our story, so lampshading, with its “don’t worry about it” and “just roll with it” attitude, risks giving readers the impression that the moment isn’t important.
- There’s no story at all without the questionable elements, so lampshading that emphasizes the issue can make the entire story feel weak or “fake.”
- Our characters’ reactions are believable within the story world, so lampshading risks an impression that we aren’t confident in our writing, worldbuilding, or characters.
Most importantly, as alluded to in that last bullet point, we don’t want to lampshade something simply because we’re not confident in our writing. Once per story, we might need to move the plot along with a contrived situation that we’re not entirely happy about, and maybe that event could use a lampshade, just to keep things moving. But lampshading due to self-consciousness can feel defensive, like we’re trying to avoid any-and-all criticism or essentially apologizing for our work. Instead, we should fix the problem so we can feel at least somewhat confident in our writing.
How to Properly Use Lampshading
Given all the above risks, we might wonder why we’d ever use the lampshading technique. However, done well, the technique can create a “we’re all in this together” bond with readers. In fact, lampshading can deepen readers’ immersion, preventing readers’ natural disbelief or skepticism about events.
So what are some ways to ensure we’re using the lampshade technique well? We can…
- Use the right level of lampshading (minor vs. major, explicit vs. subtle, frequency, etc.), matching the story and its needs.
- Maintain the narrative flow of the story through the lampshading (unless we’re not trying to be subtle with our use), as the more interruptive the lampshade is, the more noticeable it is.
- Keep any comments or reactions true to the character and/or believable for character and story world.
- Make characters react the way readers would react to the incongruent events, which can make our characters more relatable.
- Ensure the events surrounding the lampshading are still earned by the story, rather than using the lampshading to kick off a lazy-writing sequence of events.
- Anticipate readers’ thoughts of alternate plot directions, such as “why don’t they try XYZ”, and lampshade why that wouldn’t work to keep readers on the intended plot path.
- Maintain the “fourth wall” between the character’s lampshading commentary and the reader, such as by having the character comment about a character in a movie they’re watching (e.g., the boy and grandfather framing device of The Princess Bride).
- Ensure the lampshaded events add value for the reader, as they’ll be less interruptive if readers want to accept the events and move on from the issue.
- Keep the story’s style/tone and the target audience in mind with regards to frequency and placement of the technique, as even in stories where a winking, self-referential type of joke fits the tone, it’s possible to overdo, undercut important or emotional moments, or limit the appeal of the humor style (e.g., the lazy-writing complaints about recent Marvel movies).
Final Thoughts about Lampshading
The lampshade technique shouldn’t be used as a general Get-Out-Of-A-Plot-Hole-or-Lazy-Writing Card. Hanging a lampshade to flippantly dismiss real problems in a story doesn’t make them go away.
But when done well, lampshading can help us keep readers engaged with our story:
- At its least, readers see the lampshade as a fun wink rather than bad writing that causes them to disengage from the story.
- At its best, we can use it with a plot event that feels like a plot hole to readers—but that we know will have a strong, perfectly logical explanation later—to let readers know this “hole” is part of the plan and they should continue trusting us and our storytelling. It hints to readers that they’re still missing a puzzle piece to understanding the story so just enjoy the journey.
In short, lampshading done well is about keeping our readers’ trust, adding value that proves our story is worthy of their suspended disbelief. *smile*
Want to learn more about subtle vs. explicit lampshading or see examples? Visit my companion post!
Have you heard of the lampshade technique before? Did you know how to use it properly, or were you worried about the risks? Do you have any questions about the technique or how to use (and not abuse) lampshading?
Jami Gold put her talent for making up stuff to good use, such as by winning the 2015 National Readers’ Choice Award in Paranormal Romance for her novel Ironclad Devotion.
To help others reach their creative potential, she’s developed a massive collection of resources for writers. Explore her site to find worksheets—including the popular Romance Beat Sheet with 80,000+ downloads—workshops, and over 1000 posts on her blog about the craft, business, and life of writing. Her site has been named one of the 101 Best Websites for Writers by Writer’s Digest. Find out more about our RWC team here and connect with Jami below.
Patrick Witz says
Never heard of the technique or the term… but interestingly may have instinctively used it in my writing. Curious… I started a short story recently with an apparent, dramatic cliche opening sentence, “It was on a dark, foggy, early morning when tragedy struck!” Then followed that sentence with a question to the reader, “Too cliche?” Then proceeded to confirm the true aspects of the cliche, “It was dark. It was foggy. And it was early in the morning.” But then set the story line by pointing out the overly exaggerated “tragic” portion of the cliche and what truly had happened. Would that still be considered a form of Lamp-Shading?
Jami Gold says
Hi Patrick,
Yes, that sounds like lampshading, but also a form of fourth-wall breaking. It’s lampshading that speaks directly to the reader rather than using a less-directed, general “calling out” approach.
The less subtle the lampshading, the more it tends to veer into that fourth-wall-breaking territory, which can be great for some stories. Think of something like the Deadpool movies — if the style and tone of that exchange you shared are carried throughout the rest of your story, I think it could definitely work. 🙂
(Whereas, if that exchange’s style is a one-off in your story, the tone of lampshading/fourth-wall breaking of that exchange probably sets the wrong expectation of the style of the story.)
Make sense? Good luck!
RachelT says
I learned something new! I’ve run into ‘If this were a rom-com…’ regularly in romance novels to explain away storylines that are just a little too fanstastical. Always drives me crazy. Such weak story telling.
Jami Gold says
Hi Rachel,
Yes! That’s definitely lampshading. Now, whether or not that technique works or comes across like weak storytelling can depend on several things, as mentioned in this post.
So it doesn’t have to be a bad thing, but too often it can be used as a crutch by authors who don’t put in the work to make something believable. Thanks for sharing!
Sarah Kolb-Williams says
I love this! I’ve seen writers do this, and I’ve done it myself in my own fiction, but it honestly never occurred to me that there was a name for this technique (or even that it was a whole “technique”). Really interesting breakdown and gave me a lot to think about as I return to my WIP.
Jami Gold says
Hi Sarah,
Yes, there’s so much we can do with our instincts when it comes to writing. 🙂 But I figure if we understand where those instincts come from, we can use these techniques better and more purposefully. Thanks for stopping by!
Kassandra Lamb says
I’d never heard the term lamplighting before, but I realize I have done this occasionally in stories. Good to know it’s a legit technique, and I will be more mindful about using it int he future to make sure it’s appropriate. Thanks, Jami!
Kassandra Lamb says
“in the future” — Note to self, proofread the comment BEFORE you post it, not after.
Jami Gold says
Hi Kassandra,
Yes, I think many of used the technique without realizing it. 🙂 But I figured if we understand it better, we can make sure to use it well, as there are many ways to screw it up too–lol. Thanks for stopping by!
ANGELA ACKERMAN says
This is new to me, and I love that you covered it. It is an interesting technique in that is can head off possible disconnect problems, but if the technique is not used properly or with a heavy hand, it will do the opposite. I think you hit the nail on the head that it has to be done organically so it feels natural to address it, so that the reader’s trust in the author is not disrupted. You give great advice here on how to do this well – thank you!
Jami Gold says
Exactly, Angela! And making it feel “organic” and “natural” is a great way to put it. 🙂
Thanks again for having me here! <3
BECCA PUGLISI says
This is so interesting, Jami. I’d never heard of this writing technique before, and you broke it down so easily. Thanks for enlightening us!
Jami Gold says
I’m so glad this made sense, Becca. This was a tricky one to break down (hence the longer than usual post–lol!).
Thanks again for having me here! <3
MINDY ALYSE WEISS says
Thanks for this awesome post, Jami! I never heard of lampshading before…but I can see how helpful it can be if done right.
Jami Gold says
Hi Mindy,
Yes, it’s one of those techniques that the more I thought about it, the more I realized how it could be done well. 🙂 Thanks for chiming in!